BUS 250 Week 5 Final Case Analysis Paper


Final Case Analysis Paper

The Final Case Analysis Paper should demonstrate understanding of the reading as well as the implications of new knowledge.  The eight-page paper should integrate readings and class discussions into work and life experiences.  It may include explanation and examples from previous experiences as well as implications for future applications.

The purpose of the Final Case Analysis Paper is for you to culminate the learning achieved in the course by describing your understanding and application of knowledge in the field.

Focus of the Final Case Analysis Paper:

The Final Case Analysis Paper should focus on real life, real time application of topics covered in this course; the uses you have seen and the uses you can envision.  The paper must be submitted to your instructor no later than 11:59 pm of the time zone in which you reside on the last day of class.

Read Mattel and Toy Safety, which is Case Eight in the Cases in Business and Society section at the end of the book. This case describes the 2007 Mattel toy recalls, which were in response to findings that several children’s toys were coated in lead-based paint.

Write an eight to ten page paper that addresses the following questions. Support your opinions with scholarly research.

Do you believe that Mattel acted in a socially responsible and ethical manner with regard to the safety of its toys? Why or why not? What should or could Mattel have done differently, if anything? Be sure to support your answer using your research findings. Who or what do you believe was responsible for the fact that children were exposed to potentially dangerous toys? Why do you think so? Be sure to support your answer using your research findings. What is the best way to ensure the safety of children’s toys? In responding, please consider how the following groups would answer this question: government regulators (in the U.S. and China); consumer advocates, the toy industry, children’s product retailers; and standard-setting organizations. What might explain the differences in their point of view? Be sure to support your answer using your research findings. What do you think is the best way for society to protect children from harmful toys? Specifically, what are the appropriate roles for various stakeholders in this process? Be sure to support your answer using your research findings.
Writing the Final Case Analysis Paper
The Final Case Analysis Paper:

Must be eight double-spaced pages in length (excluding the title page, reference page, exhibits, etc.) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in your approved APA style guide.  Must include a cover page: Title of paper Student’s name Course name and number Instructor’s name Date submitted Must include an introductory paragraph with a clearly stated thesis or topic. Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought.  That is, what is your response to the content, either positive or negative, and then defend your position.  If multiple options/alternatives/positions are present and are being rejected you must also defend the reasons for rejecting an option. Must conclude with a restatement of the thesis or topic and a closing paragraph that summarizes the main point or points of your paper. Must use at least four scholarly resources  Must use APA style as outlined in your approved APA style guide to document all sources. Must include, on the final page, a Reference List that is completed according to APA style as outlined in your approved APA style guide.

Carefully review the Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.


BUS 250 Week 5 Final Case Analysis Paper,

While reading the Mattel and Toy Safety case it showed to America what quantity weneed a company that’s one among honesty. Mattel Inc., was thought to own been a task model once it came to safety and quality. but it didn’t that prime quality and therefore the safety of its toys. In 2007, the corporate complete up recalling several of their toys many times. The toys were recalled as a result of there was a presence of lead within the paint and additionally had magnet problems. whereas Mattel Iraqi National Congress. was accountable for distributing the toys Chinese manufactures were accountable for the problems with the toys. due to this problems i will be able to investigate during this paper why the protection issue occurred, precisely World Health Organization was accountable for the error and eventually however this downside might are prevented. to travel together with this issue i will be able to additionally refer what stakeholders had to mention on this issue and precisely what role the stakeholders had once it came to in guaranteeing the toys safety.

Before I begin to speak a few ton of the problems that occurred throughout the reading of this case i would like to present alittle background on Mattel Iraqi National Congress.  The Mattel business started in 1945. Not till 1960 tho’ did it become a publically command company. By the middle 2000’s Mattel was price a lucre of $592 million bucks. As the majority apprehend Mattel is that the leading company once it involves style, producing and promoting of most children’s toys. Mattel employs around thirty,000 workers whereas the corporate sells many alternative merchandise in additional than one hundred fifty countries. Mattel has many alternative toys that embrace a number of the bestselling and preferred toys over the years like Barbie, Hot Wheels, box and yankee lady. Even with the issues that occurred with the toy recallMattel was invariably thought-about a accountable company. They attained a high name with most of the shoppers of their merchandise. Mattel was even recognized by Forbes magazine in one among their problems as a prime one hundred most trustworthy U.S. firms and additionally was a recognized company for being one among the one hundred Best company voters by oscilloscope magazine. This shows what reasonably company Mattel has been and therefore the respect that they receive from their shoppers.

As several firms did Mattel determined to source a significant portion


There are no reviews yet.

Be the first to review “BUS 250 Week 5 Final Case Analysis Paper”

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *