BUS 250 Week 4 Assignment Case Study Vidding,
With the unlimited access to any information on the internet, there are people who are now doing vidding, or the process of taking videos online and putting it up to create a new one. These videos become a new one and they can be uploaded on a different website ready to be downloaded by other users which in turn becomes a piracy to the original video source. For those who do this kind of thing do, the reason why they don’t feel guilty about it is because they believe they are just expressing themselves and that they are not doing anything wrong. Vidders say that they are using some videos from a licensed video hence they are not copying something illegally and once their videos are put in together, it is basically a new one. This is the reason they are saying it is not fair to say that they are doing piracy with vidding.
According to the beliefs of the utilitarian, there are actions that yields positive reaction and can cause happiness when it happen hence it is just fair to say it is ethical because the result is something positive in nature (Lawrence & Weber, 2011). If we will use this principle with vidding, we would say that vidding is actually not illegal and that those who are vidding are doing what is right. The thing is what right do the vidding people have to do such thing? Rights can be overridden at times as well and this is one of the reasons vidding comes to our attention as to whether it is illegal or not (Carrol & Buchholtz, 2008). Vidding is getting videos from a video that has a copyright. The owner of the said video invested time and money to create that video hence no one has the right to grab and chop it to pieces then use it for their own good. Using parts of the original video is not originality and the utilitarian principle even failed to mention justice as well as rightness. Remember that a video is being released with the purpose of entertaining people and not for some intelligent people to use it and create a new one out of it (Lawrence & Weber, 2011). This